Hi,
On Thursday 07 April 2011 18:10:35 Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't currently have a need to fix this before 8.4, and it looks like
> the existing patch doesn't apply easily to 8.3 anyway. So I'm only
> proposing to do this in 8.4.
> Comments, objections?
I personally look forward to that as it has caused quite a bit of work in the
field working around that problem. And I et quite a bit of calls asking what to
do when that problem manifests. And all answers to that question suck.
Not touching execQual.c sounds sensible.
Andres