| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mark Wong <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, gabrielle <gorthx(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: multiple -f support |
| Date: | 2011-03-11 12:17:31 |
| Message-ID: | 201103111217.p2BCHVL15642@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > I assume having psql support multiple -f files is not a high priority or
> > something we don't want.
>
> IIRC, nobody objected to the basic concept, and it seems useful. I
> thought we were pretty close to committing something along those lines
> at one point, actually. I don't remember exactly where the wheels
> came off.
>
> Maybe a TODO?
Added to the psql section:
|Allow processing of multiple -f (file) options
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-03-11 12:18:27 | Re: SAVEPOINTs and COMMIT performance |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-03-11 12:08:09 | Re: Sync Rep v19 |