Re: CommitFest 2011-01 as of 2011-02-04

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CommitFest 2011-01 as of 2011-02-04
Date: 2011-02-15 01:11:25
Message-ID: 20110215011125.GO4116@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> But the
> trickiest part of this whole process is that, on the one hand, it's
> not fair for committers to ignore other people's patches, but on the
> other hand, it's not fair to expect committers to sacrifice getting
> their own projects done to get other people's projects done.

It wasn't my intent to ask the committers to do more but rather to
change the timings a bit so that when committers begin their "commitfest
month", the patches are already in better quality and more apt to be
ready for committer.

Anyhow, was just a thought.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2011-02-15 01:29:01 Re: Replication server timeout patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-02-15 01:03:50 Re: why two dashes in extension load files