Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Charles(dot)McDevitt(at)emc(dot)com
Cc: alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com, greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, mbanck(at)debian(dot)org, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
Date: 2011-02-11 20:25:56
Message-ID: 20110211202556.GW4116@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Charles(dot)McDevitt(at)emc(dot)com (Charles(dot)McDevitt(at)emc(dot)com) wrote:
> Don't forget that OpenSSL has a FIPS-140 compliant version, and FIPS-140 compliance is essential to many Federal users.

Essential? That's a bit much. Yes, it shows up on a FISMA review as an
open action item, but it's a risk that can both be accepted and
mitigated. I also thought FIPS-140 version required API changes..

> GnuTLS doesn't qualify.

That should be "doesn't currently"..

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-02-11 20:26:54 Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-02-11 20:23:47 Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3