| From: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Bob Price <rjp_email(at)yahoo(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: how to avoid repeating expensive computation in select | 
| Date: | 2011-02-03 17:23:10 | 
| Message-ID: | 20110203122310.11309282.wmoran@potentialtech.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general | 
In response to Bob Price <rjp_email(at)yahoo(dot)com>:
> I have been searching through the docs and mailing list and haven't found a way to do this, so I thought I would ask the community.
> 
> I would like to know if there is a way in PostgreSQL to avoid repeating an expensive computation in a SELECT where the result is needed both as a returned value and as an expression in the WHERE clause.
> 
> As a simple example, consider the following query on a table with 'id' and 'value' columns, and an expensive computation represented as a function:
> 
>   SELECT id, expensivefunc(value) AS score FROM mytable
>      WHERE id LIKE '%z%' AND expensivefunc(value) > 0.5;
> 
> It would be great if I could find a way to only compute expensivefunc(value) at most once per row, and not at all if the other WHERE constraints are not satisfied.
Two ways that I can think of:
1) If expensivefunc() doesn't have any side-effects, you can create it
   as IMMUTABLE, which tells PostgreSQL that it can cache the result
   for optimization purposes.  IMMUTABLE is not the default.
2) Create a new column in the table that stores the value of
   expensivefunc(value) and add a trigger to the table to ensure that
   column is updated any time value is changed.  This will slow down
   inserts and updates a bit, but it means you can select/compare the
   generated column directly with no calculation.
Which one of these is more practical for you depends on a number of
factors about the table, the data, and the function.
-- 
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Wappler, Robert | 2011-02-03 17:41:54 | Re: set theory question | 
| Previous Message | Bob Price | 2011-02-03 17:17:30 | how to avoid repeating expensive computation in select |