From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Doc reference of contrib modules |
Date: | 2011-01-25 15:57:28 |
Message-ID: | 201101251557.p0PFvSj25427@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> That's not just awkward, but flat wrong, because the link points to
> >> documentation of the module not the function.
>
> > The tag for the dblink module is:
>
> > <sect1 id="dblink">
>
> > the function's tag is:
>
> > <refentry id="CONTRIB-DBLINK">
>
> > so I believe the text in the patch is correct. (Yes, I realize those
> > are confusing tags.)
>
> Oh. Please change the function's tag to something a bit saner while
> you're messing around with this, FUNCTION-DBLINK perhaps?
OK, done in attached patch. (Git does allow easier incremental patch
generation.)
> I still think that a link to the contrib module's page would be a good
> thing to provide here.
Yep, but how to do it in a clear way?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
/rtmp/dblink.diff | text/x-diff | 1.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-01-25 16:10:45 | Re: Doc reference of contrib modules |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-01-25 15:43:32 | Re: Doc reference of contrib modules |