From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vladimir Kokovic <vladimir(dot)kokovic(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_test_fsync problem |
Date: | 2011-01-25 00:43:02 |
Message-ID: | 201101250043.p0P0h2R11196@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > He's complaining that it dies with EINVAL.
>
> > I notice that (1) it's using O_DIRECT even though the printout claims
> > otherwise, and (2) it's writing from a buffer that has no better than
> > char alignment, which is certainly not OK for O_DIRECT. Either one
> > of those could plausibly result in EINVAL ...
>
> Oh, scratch that: the buffer is properly aligned, it's the length that's
> bogus for O_DIRECT. I rather imagine that test_open_sync is meant to be
> writing so many kilobytes, not so many bytes.
Yes, that was a bug in my code that I have fixed with the attached,
applied patch. Thanks for the report.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
/rtmp/fsync.fix | text/x-diff | 904 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-25 00:56:06 | Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-01-25 00:19:45 | Re: Use of O_DIRECT only for open_* sync options |