| From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | "Jaiswal Dhaval Sudhirkumar" <JaiswalDS(at)microland(dot)com>, "John R Pierce" <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: HA solution |
| Date: | 2011-01-16 20:11:48 |
| Message-ID: | 201101161211.49297.adrian.klaver@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sunday 16 January 2011 7:19:49 am Jaiswal Dhaval Sudhirkumar wrote:
> Thanks for your great comments.
>
> I have gone through suggested link & the streaming replication with 9.0+.
> (We are using PostgreSQL 8.4. Not to worry I will migrate it to 9.0+)
>
> It seems to me that if i will go with this Active/Hot stand by(stream)
> architecture, I can generate the report from my standby database; which is
> in readable mode. Isn't it?
Yes.
>
> Can i take the dump from my standby database through pg_dump?
See here for answer and a suggestion:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2010-07/msg00767.php
>
> Is this standby comfortable with Big datatypes like (BLOB, CLOB, GIS, etc.)
> & partitioning table?
The built-in replication works at the binary level and ships whatever happens on
A to B. For a more in depth look see this Wiki page:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Binary_Replication_Tutorial#What_Can_You_Do_With_Binary_Replication.3F
>
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards
> Dhaval Jaiswal
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fernando Hevia | 2011-01-16 20:20:47 | Re: Re: [pgsql-es-ayuda] Para participantes extranjeros en el Tercer PGDay Latinoamericano. |
| Previous Message | Alban Hertroys | 2011-01-16 18:49:12 | Re: How to generate unique invoice numbers for each day |