| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade patches applied |
| Date: | 2011-01-05 15:39:08 |
| Message-ID: | 201101051539.p05Fd8m24009@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > The last patch fixes a problem where I was not migrating
> > pg_largeobject_metadata and its index for 9.0+ migrations, which of
> > course would only affect migrations to 9.1 and 9.0 to 9.0 migrations, so
> > I backpatched that to 9.0.
>
> That isn't going to work. At least not unless you start trying to force
> roles to have the same OIDs in the new installation.
Uh, don't we store the pg_shadow.usesysid in pg_largeobject_metadata?
If so I can use the CREATE ROLE ... SYSID clause when doing a binary
upgrade.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2011-01-05 15:42:08 | Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE patch v1 |
| Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2011-01-05 15:32:51 | Re: Streaming base backups |