| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] pg_filedump binary for CentOS |
| Date: | 2010-10-15 14:29:28 |
| Message-ID: | 20110.1287152968@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org> writes:
> Just wondering what was the motivation to GPL this code ?
It was written at Red Hat and they have (or at least had at the time)
a company policy of using GPL for any code written in-house.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2010-10-15 15:03:53 | Re: Segfault : PostgreSQL 9.0.0 and PgPool-II. |
| Previous Message | Ugo PARSI | 2010-10-15 14:27:51 | Re: Segfault : PostgreSQL 9.0.0 and PgPool-II. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-10-15 14:38:54 | Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-10-15 14:27:20 | Re: Re: starting to review the Extend NOT NULL representation to pg_constraint patch |