| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: extensible enums |
| Date: | 2010-11-13 03:05:29 |
| Message-ID: | 201011130305.oAD35T300525@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 11/12/2010 09:18 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > OK, got it. Added incomplete TODO item:
> >
> > Allow renaming and deleting enumerated values from an existing
> > enumerated data type
> >
>
>
> I have serious doubts that deleting will ever be sanely doable.
True. Should we not mention it then? I can't think of many objects we
can't delete.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2010-11-13 03:36:58 | Label switcher function |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-11-13 02:56:01 | Re: WIP: extensible enums |