From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade patch application process, and move to /bin? |
Date: | 2010-10-20 19:32:09 |
Message-ID: | 201010201932.o9KJW9v11354@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 21:28, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> >> One more question --- should I be sending pg_upgrade patches to the list
> >> for approval? ?The restructuring patch was large and didn't seem
> >> necessary to post, and the speedups were tested by the bug reporter, so
> >> I figured those were OK to apply.
> >
> > I think it would be good to do that. ?At least give people a chance to
> > comment, if they care.
>
> +1. It's also a good way for people to get a bit more involved in the code.
OK.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-10-20 19:33:12 | Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-10-20 19:30:01 | Re: pg_upgrade patch application process, and move to /bin? |