From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Eric McKeeth <eldin00(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Exclusion constraint issue |
Date: | 2010-09-26 15:41:28 |
Message-ID: | 20100926154128.GD22240@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:15:00AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 05:22:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> period() might be immutable, but those casts from date to
> >> timestamptz are not, because they depend on the TimeZone
> >> parameter.
>
> > How hard would it be to point out the first expression found to be
> > mutable?
>
> I looked at that yesterday. It would take significant restructuring
> of the code involved :-( ... the place that throws the error doesn't
> know exactly what subnode was found to be mutable, and IIRC it
> hasn't got access to the original command string anyway.
How much restructuring are we talking about here?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2010-09-26 18:14:41 | Re: Visualize GiST Index |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-26 14:15:00 | Re: Exclusion constraint issue |