Re: Exclusion constraint issue

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Eric McKeeth <eldin00(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Exclusion constraint issue
Date: 2010-09-26 15:41:28
Message-ID: 20100926154128.GD22240@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:15:00AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 05:22:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> period() might be immutable, but those casts from date to
> >> timestamptz are not, because they depend on the TimeZone
> >> parameter.
>
> > How hard would it be to point out the first expression found to be
> > mutable?
>
> I looked at that yesterday. It would take significant restructuring
> of the code involved :-( ... the place that throws the error doesn't
> know exactly what subnode was found to be mutable, and IIRC it
> hasn't got access to the original command string anyway.

How much restructuring are we talking about here?

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2010-09-26 18:14:41 Re: Visualize GiST Index
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-09-26 14:15:00 Re: Exclusion constraint issue