| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Git conversion status |
| Date: | 2010-09-20 18:26:24 |
| Message-ID: | 201009202026.24916.andres@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday 20 September 2010 20:22:55 Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On Monday 20 September 2010 20:15:50 Tom Lane wrote:
> >> BTW, while poking around in this morning's attempt I noticed
> >> .git/description, containing
> >>
> >> Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
> >>
> >> No idea if this is shown anywhere or if there is any practical way to
> >> change it once the repo's been published. Might be an idea to stick
> >> something in there.
> >
> > Its mostly used for display in gitweb and can be changed anytime.
>
> Hm, I might've misinterpreted its semantics. Is that file copied by
> "git clone", or is it something that's unique to each physical
> repository?
Unique to each "physical repository" (like everything in .git - unless you
count the cloned 'objects').
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2010-09-20 18:29:41 | Re: Git conversion status |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-20 18:25:11 | Re: Git conversion status |