From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fix for pg_upgrade's forcing pg_controldata into English |
Date: | 2010-09-01 23:56:45 |
Message-ID: | 201009012356.o81Nuj405114@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> However, that's something for 9.1 and beyond. Bruce's immediate problem
> >> is what to do in pg_upgrade in 9.0, and there I concur that he should
> >> duplicate what pg_regress is doing.
>
> > OK, here is a patch that sets all the variables that pg_regress.c sets.
>
> I certainly hope that pg_regress isn't freeing the strings it passes
> to putenv() ...
pg_regress does not restore these settings (it says with C/English) so
the code is different.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-02 00:08:47 | Re: Fix for pg_upgrade's forcing pg_controldata into English |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-01 23:55:45 | Re: compiling with RELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE doesn't pass regression |