Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [INTERFACES] ECPG Documentation Improvement

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Satoshi Nagayasu <satoshi(dot)nagayasu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Lars Nordin <lars(dot)nordin(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ECPG Documentation Improvement
Date: 2010-08-12 01:47:11
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-interfaces
Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
> On 2010/07/29 17:41, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > I had a short look at the docs Satoshi-san put online and yes, I'm impressed.
> > However, I won't be able to proof read them before September. But given that
> > 9.1 development is just starting I see no problem in putting the docs into the
> > archive be it cvs or git and improve if there if it really needs improvement.
> > In my short check I didn't see anything major that needed to be changed. This
> > of course implies that the new docs are available in a suitable format.
> Thank you all for your attention to the ecpg document work.
> Yes, I see some developers are too busy, so it's difficult to take time
> to review such large amount of changes of the doc for now.
> I'm thinking about taking a few weeks after August or September
> to review and merge the document intensively (like CommitFest)
> by some developers who are interested in this doc.
> I know this change is very huge, and it's very difficult to review
> and give feedback through the whole document. So I think we sould take
> an approach to review and merge chapter by chapter during the period,
> and it can be an effective way to merge this large change
> if we can take time for such intensive work.
> Is this possible? Any suggestions?

I would like to help too.

  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Thom BrownDate: 2010-08-12 19:49:59
Subject: Confusing example context
Previous:From: Satoshi NagayasuDate: 2010-08-12 00:51:18
Subject: Re: ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Bosco RamaDate: 2010-08-26 00:02:00
Subject: Re: Large object support in ecpg
Previous:From: Bosco RamaDate: 2010-08-05 22:17:28
Subject: Large object support in ecpg

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group