On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 04:30:05PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > .Org is not the weight behind your SPAM complaints. You will need a
> > different bully against that foe.
> I think JD has this one right. There may or may not be a reason to
> ban Continuent (or anyone else) from our mailing lists, but the fact
> that they've sent spam to David Fetter in his personal capacity is not
For future reference, what *would* be a sufficient reason? I have
this feeling that this situation will recur, even if this particular
outfit decides to play nice, so we might as well knock together some
criteria in advance.
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-07-29 21:50:05|
|Subject: Re: Continuent & pgsql-announce ... please do not approve|
|Previous:||From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira||Date: 2010-07-29 21:00:57|
|Subject: Re: [pgbr-dev] consolidação das listas (round #1) ... ou não|