Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Continuent & pgsql-announce ... please do not approve

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>,Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>,pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org,"Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Continuent & pgsql-announce ... please do not approve
Date: 2010-07-29 21:11:00
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 04:30:05PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > .Org is not the weight behind your SPAM complaints. You will need a
> > different bully against that foe.
> I think JD has this one right.  There may or may not be a reason to
> ban Continuent (or anyone else) from our mailing lists, but the fact
> that they've sent spam to David Fetter in his personal capacity is not
> it.

For future reference, what *would* be a sufficient reason?  I have
this feeling that this situation will recur, even if this particular
outfit decides to play nice, so we might as well knock together some
criteria in advance.

David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres:

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-07-29 21:50:05
Subject: Re: Continuent & pgsql-announce ... please do not approve
Previous:From: Euler Taveira de OliveiraDate: 2010-07-29 21:00:57
Subject: Re: [pgbr-dev] consolidação das listas (round #1) ... ou não

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group