| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Benjamin Krajmalnik <kraj(at)servoyant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah(dot)rajesh(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: cpu bound postgresql setup. |
| Date: | 2010-06-28 21:44:33 |
| Message-ID: | 201006282144.o5SLiXw20469@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Benjamin Krajmalnik wrote:
> Rajesh,
>
> I had a similar situation a few weeks ago whereby performance all of a
> sudden decreased.
> The one tunable which resolved the problem in my case was increasing the
> number of checkpoint segments.
> After increasing them, everything went back to its normal state.
Did you get a db server log message suggesting in increasing that
setting? I hope so.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ None of us is going to be here forever. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-06-28 21:57:25 | Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-06-28 20:18:58 | Re: order by slowing down a query by 80 times |