| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chris <rfusca(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2 |
| Date: | 2010-06-28 21:18:29 |
| Message-ID: | 201006282118.o5SLIUg16409@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> > You could argue it either way. The number of beta testers with
> > plpython3 installations is probably very small, so I'm kinda leaning to
> > just changing the code without a catversion bump. OTOH, if we want to
> > encourage testing of pg_upgrade ...
>
> FWIW, the last bump has led to a lot of testing of pgupgrade.
And fixes, that will appear in 9.0 beta3. :-) Most fixes were related
to platform compile portability.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ None of us is going to be here forever. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-06-28 22:54:16 | Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2 |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-06-28 20:48:40 | Re: Admission Control |