Re: [PERFORM] Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Max Williams <max(dot)williams(at)mflow(dot)com>, lacey(dot)powers(at)commandprompt(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4?
Date: 2010-06-13 01:08:17
Message-ID: 201006130108.o5D18Hv23222@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue jun 10 11:46:25 -0400 2010:
>
> > Yes, the folks at commandprompt need to be told about this. Loudly.
> > It's a serious packaging error.
>
> Just notified Lacey, the packager (not so loudly, though); she's working
> on new packages, and apologizes for the inconvenience.

[ Thread moved to hackers. 8.4.4 RPMs were built with debug flags. ]

Uh, where are we on this? Has it been completed? How are people
informed about this? Do we need to post to the announce email list?
Does Yum just update them? How did this mistake happen? How many days
did it take to detect the problem?

Why has no news been posted here?

https://public.commandprompt.com/projects/pgcore/news

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ None of us is going to be here forever. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mohammad Heykal Abdillah 2010-06-13 03:28:51 It's possible to get pg_class oid from GETSTRUC macro?
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-06-12 20:51:48 Re: Command to prune archive at restartpoints

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-06-13 06:02:23 Re: Analysis Function
Previous Message Greg Smith 2010-06-12 20:46:29 Re: ~400 TPS - good or bad?