Re: Error with GIT Repository

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)noblis(dot)org>, "Luxenberg, Scott I(dot)" <Scott(dot)Luxenberg(at)noblis(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Error with GIT Repository
Date: 2010-06-10 16:20:29
Message-ID: 20100610162029.GI21875@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

* Andrew Dunstan (andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net) wrote:
> I don't see why not. Buildfarm members are going to have to reset their
> repos when we finally cut over in a few months. Luckily, this is a
> fairly painless operation - blow away the repo and change the config
> file and the script will resync as if nothing had happened.

Should we stop bothering to offer http://git.postgresql.org then..? Or
do we expect it to get fixed and work correctly once we cut over and
rebuild? Also, perhaps we could list the git-hub option on the wiki
(http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Other_Git_Repositories)?

(and, yea, it's the same me)

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-06-10 16:34:47 Re: Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-06-10 16:15:56 Re: Error with GIT Repository

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-06-10 16:34:47 Re: Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-06-10 16:15:56 Re: Error with GIT Repository