Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Command to prune archive at restartpoints

From: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Command to prune archive at restartpoints
Date: 2010-06-09 01:45:20
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> >> I prefer archive_cleanup_command. We should name things after their
> >> principal function, not an implementation detail, IMNSHO.
> >
> > Weak preference for archive_cleanup_command here.
> OK, sounds like we have consensus on that.  Who wants to do it?

Do we just need to replace all of them? If so, patch attached.
I replaced 3 terms: recovery_end_command, recovery-end-command,
and recoveryEndCommand.

Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment: archive_cleanup_command.patch
Description: application/octet-stream (6.2 KB)

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-06-09 01:51:00
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Invalid YAML output from EXPLAIN
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-06-09 01:38:17
Subject: Re: How about closing some Open Items?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group