Re: ALTER TABLE .... make constraint DEFERRABLE

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE .... make constraint DEFERRABLE
Date: 2010-06-03 01:06:12
Message-ID: 201006030106.o5316Cv00489@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> Deferrable unique constraints seem an interesting feature, though I have
> either some questions or some issues, not sure which.
>
> I don't seem to be able to find any way to do an ALTER TABLE that adds
> this new capability to an existing table.

I was able to do it:

test=> create table test (x int unique DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED);
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / UNIQUE will create implicit index "test_x_key"
for table "test"
CREATE TABLE

test=> alter table test add column y int;
ALTER TABLE

test=> alter table test add unique (y) DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED;
NOTICE: ALTER TABLE / ADD UNIQUE will create implicit index
"test_y_key" for table "test"
ALTER TABLE

Is that what you were asking?

> There is no way to add a constraint via a CREATE TABLE AS SELECT, so
> that means there is no way to use the feature at all in that case.

Uh, CREATE TABLE AS SELECT seems to be very limited, but I have not
heard any complaints about it before.

> Also, foreign keys can't be defined that refer to a deferrable primary
> key. That isn't mentioned at all in the manual with regard to the
> DEFERRABLE clause, though it is mentioned in the FK section. You get
> this error message
> ERROR: cannot use a deferrable unique constraint for referenced table
>
> The use case for this feature looks a little narrow at present. Can we
> do something about usability?

Not sure why that was a limitation.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ None of us is going to be here forever. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Pflug 2010-06-03 01:07:49 Re: recovery getting interrupted is not so unusual as it used to be
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2010-06-03 00:47:10 Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay