| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Giles Lean <giles(dot)lean(at)pobox(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: is_absolute_path incorrect on Windows |
| Date: | 2010-06-01 22:19:49 |
| Message-ID: | 201006012219.o51MJnT18218@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Robert Haas wrote:
> >> Maybe something like is_under_cwd()?
>
> > Yeah, is_below_cwd?
>
> Hm. Neither of these obviously exclude the case of an absolute path
> that happens to lead to cwd. I'm not sure how important that is,
> but still ...
We currently do that with path_is_prefix_of_path(). Maybe that needs to
be called as well.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ None of us is going to be here forever. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-06-01 22:34:38 | Re: is_absolute_path incorrect on Windows |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-06-01 22:09:51 | Re: is_absolute_path incorrect on Windows |