Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Yes, but if we are going to have to honor "=>" eventually, shouldn't we
> > just do it now? Supporting := and => seems confusing.
>
> Personally, I haven't accepted the "if" part of that, therefore I
> feel no need to argue over the "then".
Right, I am asking about the "if" part.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com