Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature
Date: 2010-05-31 15:24:44
Message-ID: 13367.1275319484@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Yes, but if we are going to have to honor "=>" eventually, shouldn't we
> just do it now? Supporting := and => seems confusing.

Personally, I haven't accepted the "if" part of that, therefore I
feel no need to argue over the "then".

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2010-05-31 15:28:46 Re: PG 9.0 release timetable
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-05-31 15:22:08 Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature