| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | alvherre <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Regression testing for psql |
| Date: | 2010-05-27 00:36:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20100527003634.GG21875@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> There might be some value in psql backslash command tests that
> are designed to depend on just one or a few tables (or other appropriate
> objects). Dumping large fractions of the catalogs will just be a net
> loss.
Fair enough, I can certainly do that pretty easily. Stripping out the
unqualified \d*S commands should result in a much, much, much smaller
output, with corresponding less changes due to catalog changes.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-05-27 00:39:21 | Re: out-of-date comment in CreateRestartPoint() |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-05-27 00:30:36 | Re: Regression testing for psql |