| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_migrator to /contrib in a later 9.0 beta |
| Date: | 2010-05-06 19:55:49 |
| Message-ID: | 201005061955.o46Jtng05353@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > > On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 20:24 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > >> I think it will be confusing if we change the name, so I vote to not
> > >> change the name.
> >
> > > Actually, I would vote yes to change the name.
> >
> > I lean that way too. If there were no history involved, we'd certainly
> > prefer pg_upgrade to pg_migrator.
>
> Yeah, that was my feeling too. People like "pg_upgrade", or something
> else? I will add some text like "pg_upgrade (formerly pg_migrator)" in
> the docs.
OK, seems people like pg_upgrade, but do we call it "pgupgrade" or
"pg_upgrade"? I don't see consistent naming in /contrib:
pg_buffercache/
pg_freespacemap/
pg_standby/
pg_stat_statements/
pg_trgm/
pgbench/
pgcrypto/
pgrowlocks/
pgstattuple/
The original 7.2 name was "pg_upgrade":
http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/contrib/pg_upgrade/Attic/
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thom Brown | 2010-05-06 20:10:27 | Re: pg_migrator to /contrib in a later 9.0 beta |
| Previous Message | Andy Lester | 2010-05-06 19:51:46 | PATCH: Minor doc addition to CLUSTER page |