| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Damian Carey <jamianb(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pl/java status |
| Date: | 2010-04-15 02:53:41 |
| Message-ID: | 201004150253.o3F2rf609617@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Damian Carey wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 6:18 AM, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> wrote:
> > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>
> >> Mostly, I think you will find that the back end developers aren't fond
> >> of Java and thus, it doesn't get much love.
> >>
> >> There is a reason that plPerl is king in this community (and I don't
> >> even like Perl).
> >>
> >
>
> Java2perl anyone ?
> http://search.cpan.org/~philcrow/Java-Javap-0.04/bin/java2perl6
> (99% joking)
>
> And if you think positively a 14hour TZ difference is really only 10
> if you go the other way.
Is PL/J still being developed? I can't find it myself, but was curious.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | gvim | 2010-04-15 03:04:15 | Inconsistent SQL errors |
| Previous Message | raghavendra t | 2010-04-15 01:50:21 | Re: VACUUM process running for a long time |