Re: planet "top posters" section

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> >> That would be reasonable too, although it's a little hard to think
> >> about how to apply that to the team section, since the individuals are
> >> listed under the teams. ?Clearly you could also omit teams with 2 or
> >> fewer postings, but what if the team has >2 but some - or all -
> >> individuals within the team have <=2?
> >
> > Well, that's an incentive to join a team.
>
> Hmm. Well, by that theory, Bruce should quite his job: he'd go from
> somewhere buried down in the weeds to the number one spot on the list.

I know Magnus wants to point out that the _quality_ of my posts is not
being measured in that count, so I will write this for him. ;-)

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com