Re: GSOC PostgreSQL partitioning issue

From: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Necati Batur <necatibatur(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GSOC PostgreSQL partitioning issue
Date: 2010-04-09 02:46:51
Message-ID: 20100409114651.8E15.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> An introduction to the current state of work in progress for adding
> improved partitioning features to PostgreSQL is documented at
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Table_partitioning

Also, here is my latest patch for it:
http://repo.or.cz/w/pgsql-fdw.git/shortlog/refs/heads/partition

I'd like to ask Necati what problem you will solve, rather than
what module you will develop. Performance? Usability? Or othres?

Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message chaoyong wang 2010-04-09 03:50:13 C-Language Fun on VC2005 ERROR: could not load library
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-04-09 02:29:18 extended operator classes vs. type interfaces