Re: sorry, too many standbys already vs. MaxWalSenders vs. max_wal_senders

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: sorry, too many standbys already vs. MaxWalSenders vs. max_wal_senders
Date: 2010-04-01 01:43:37
Message-ID: 201004010143.o311hb321085@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> After snapshotting my master using hot backup to create a workable
> slave instance, I created recovery.conf on the slave and tried to get
> it to connect to the master and stream WAL.
>
> This led to the message "sorry, too many standbys already", which did
> not immediately clue me in as to what I needed to do to fix the
> problem. Grepping the source code for the error message revealed that
> the problem was that MaxWalSenders was zero. A few seconds further
> head-scratching revealed that this was the GUC max_wal_senders, which
> I duly increased from 0 to 1, after which it worked.
>
> I think perhaps this error message needs some adjustment. It should
> be reasonably possible to guess the name of the GUC that needs
> increasing based on the error message, and it currently isn't. Also
> I'd vote for making the variable name max_wal_senders rather than
> MaxWalSenders, but maybe that's being persnicketty.

Glad the error message has been improved. I was bitten by this exact
error message and didn't know the cause for a while, and was going to
suggest such a fix.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2010-04-01 01:50:13 Re: Streaming replication document improvements
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-04-01 01:31:39 Re: pgindent excluded files list