Re: 9.0 release notes done

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.0 release notes done
Date: 2010-03-20 15:35:43
Message-ID: 201003201535.o2KFZhD07045@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hitoshi Harada wrote:
> 2010/3/20 Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>:
> > I have completed the 9.0 release notes:
> >
> > ? ? ? ?http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/release-9-0.html
> >
>
> I wonder if we need note a minor compatibility from extending window
> function's frame.
>
> - Change BETWEEN from TYPE_FUNC_NAME_KEYWORD from COL_NAME_KEYWORD

I see. The change appears to be from "can be function or type name" to
"cannot be function or type name", according to
misc.c::pg_get_keywords().

What error will they see if they do use an invalid name? Will it be
clear that they just need to rename it?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-03-20 15:39:35 Re: 9.0 release notes done
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-03-20 10:57:38 Re: 9.0 release notes done