Re: [patch] build issues on Win32

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 01:34:34PM -0800, Steve Atkins wrote:
> On Mar 11, 2010, at 1:06 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > BTW, I'm not sure I buy the argument that commercial software
> > requires static linking. Red Hat would be as interested in that
> > market as anybody, and as I said, they don't think it's necessary
> > to ship static libraries (with a *very* short list of exceptions).
>
> Trying to support a binary distributed[1] application on a dozen or
> more different distributions is fairly painful (I'm building on four
> Debians, eight Ubuntus, several RHELs, three Solarises and a few
> others right now), and the biggest problem is the different
> distributions don't package all the libraries you need, and when
> they do they include a wide range of versions, often woefully
> obsolete.

I've found it easiest to ship all of PostgreSQL rather than deal with
this kind of stuff.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate