Re: Dyamic updates of NEW with pl/pgsql

From: strk <strk(at)keybit(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: depesz(at)depesz(dot)com, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Dyamic updates of NEW with pl/pgsql
Date: 2010-03-11 14:27:23
Message-ID: 20100311142723.GR62719@keybit.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 07:50:16AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> Using an hstore in 9.0 it's not too bad,

Does it still have a limit of 65535 bytes per field ?

--strk;

() Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
/\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-03-11 14:31:46 Can we still trust plperl?
Previous Message Greg Stark 2010-03-11 14:22:42 Re: operator exclusion constraints