Re: Custom GUCs still a bit broken

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Custom GUCs still a bit broken
Date: 2010-03-03 23:52:23
Message-ID: 201003032352.o23NqNF01655@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> >> Nowhere, really. I tried to fix it, but could not come up with anything
> >> remotely clean.
> >>
> >
> > So it is something for the TODO list or a 9.0 open item?
> >
> >
>
> It's not new, AFAIK. So arguably fixing it could just be a TODO. I don't
> have time right now to go down that rathole.

OK, added to TODO:

Have custom GUCs be transaction safe

http://archives.postgresql.org/message-by-id(dot)php?4B577E9F(dot)8000505(at)dunslane(dot)net

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-03-04 00:01:56 Re: Safe security
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-03-03 23:41:34 Re: Custom GUCs still a bit broken