Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)

From: "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)
Date: 2010-03-02 00:05:21
Message-ID: 201003011705.21393.pgsql@bluepolka.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Monday 01 March 2010 @ 16:57, Tom Lane wrote:>
> Now that I look more closely at those line numbers, it looks
> like the thing thinks it is processing an include file. Are
> there any @ signs in your global/pg_auth file?

Yes, indeed, there are many. My user names are "user(at)host" form,
and have been for years. Would that be a problem now?

Ed

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ed L. 2010-03-02 00:12:36 Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-03-01 23:57:24 Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-03-02 00:08:05 Re: [Feature request] variable declaration of anonymous composite data type in PL/pgSQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-03-01 23:57:24 Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)