| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Mikko <mhannesy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: trouble with to_char('L') |
| Date: | 2010-02-25 23:33:29 |
| Message-ID: | 201002252333.o1PNXTX05550@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Where are we on this issue?
>
> According to my files, I complained about the extreme ugliness of the
> patch (redefining strdup for pete's sake) and the fact that it did not
> actually do things anything like the LC_TIME code as was claimed.
> Hiroshi rejected those criticisms. I don't know where we are, but
> I don't want to see this patch applied in this form.
Right, but you are saying it is still an open issue, which says we
should look at it.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-25 23:46:53 | Re: trouble with to_char('L') |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-25 23:32:05 | Re: trouble with to_char('L') |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2010-02-25 23:45:03 | Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-25 23:32:05 | Re: trouble with to_char('L') |