Re: to_timestamp error handling.

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Dhaval Jaiswal <dhaval(dot)jaiswal(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: to_timestamp error handling.
Date: 2010-02-24 19:45:34
Message-ID: 201002241945.o1OJjYI11898@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs


FYI, this behavior now returns:

test=> select to_timestamp('20096010','YYYYMMDD');
to_timestamp
------------------------
2013-12-18 00:00:00-05
(1 row)

which doesn't have the :30 but is still odd. I don't see any value
checking in to_timestamp.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dhaval Jaiswal wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> postgres=# select to_timestamp('20096010','YYYYMMDD');
>
> to_timestamp
>
> ---------------------------
>
> 2013-12-18 00:00:00+05:30
>
> (1 row)
>
>
>
> The month is 60 in my case and it is giving some random value, whereas I am
> expecting some error message like date is not valid.
>
>
>
> Is it an expected behaviour?
>
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards,
> Dhaval Jaiswal
> EnterpriseDB
> Contact: 732-331-1300 Ext- 2022
> +91-20-30589 516 / 494
> web: www.enterprisedb.com

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-02-24 20:00:50 Re: to_timestamp error handling.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-02-24 18:11:10 Re: [BUGS] BUG #4887: inclusion operator (@>) on tsqeries behaves not conforming to documentation