| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Major features of 9.0? |
| Date: | 2010-02-22 21:10:40 |
| Message-ID: | 20100222211040.GP2917@fetter.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:45:40PM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 February 2010 17:02:39 Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Josh Berkus:
> > >> Isn't hstore key/value pair data, rather than schema-less.
> > >
> > > Well, when the "NoSQL" people talk about "schemaless", that's
> > > what they mean.
> >
> > Some of them have got arbitrarily nested documents involving
> > sequences, booleans, sequences of string/document pairs, strings,
> > and floats. Positioning PostgreSQL's simple key/value support
> > against that could be a PR mistake. 8-)
>
> A better way to look at it is "improved support for storing
> semi-structured and un-structured data". Because we have pretty
> good support for that really, but these changes should make that
> somewhat better.
There's a technical term we use for "un-structured data:" random bits.
That other people use this misnomer isn't a reason we should
perpetuate it.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2010-02-24 03:25:15 | Re: Major features of 9.0? |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2010-02-22 20:45:40 | Re: Major features of 9.0? |