Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG
Date: 2010-02-16 18:41:50
Message-ID: 20100216184150.GA5305@feivel.credativ.lan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:21:34PM +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> > Does FreeBSD/MIPS really return true for isinf(NaN)?

Actually it's a netbsd beta version, so maybe there's a bug in their libc.

But anyway, the patch doesn't seem to hurt, so I committed it.

Michael

--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype michaelmeskes, Jabber meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-02-16 18:59:58 Re: Problem with 8.4 stats collector high load
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2010-02-16 18:30:04 Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY and notification timing guarantees