On Monday 15 February 2010 08:13:32 Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > The buildfarm indicates that this patch has got some serious issues.
> Actually, looking closer, some of the Windows machines started failing
> after the *earlier* patch to add directory fsyncs.
And not only the windows machines. Seems sensible to add a configure check
whether directory-fsyncing works.
But at least I am not capable of writing good m4/configure.in/whatever without
Will try if nobody else with more knowledge does and if somebody will look
over it afterwards.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2010-02-15 08:47:09|
|Subject: Re: idle in txn query cancellation|
|Previous:||From: Leonardo F||Date: 2010-02-15 08:26:19|
|Subject: [FWD] About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch|
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Takahiro Itagaki||Date: 2010-02-15 09:27:12|
|Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add psql tab completion for DO blocks. |
|Previous:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2010-02-15 07:33:22|
|Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Reduce the chatter to the log
when starting a standby server.|