| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: psql tab completion for DO blocks |
| Date: | 2010-02-12 01:35:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20100212013538.GI11972@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:26:10PM -0200, Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> Takahiro Itagaki escreveu:
> > Should we fix the documentation when we add the tab completion?
> >
> Yes, it seems consistent with other commands having optional
> parameters in the middle of the command rather than at the end.
It's consistent with how we do CREATE FUNCTION, where the order of
parameters after RETURNS is arbitrary.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Euler Taveira de Oliveira | 2010-02-12 02:21:02 | Re: psql tab completion for DO blocks |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2010-02-12 01:33:15 | Re: psql tab completion for DO blocks |