| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: damage control mode |
| Date: | 2010-02-08 15:25:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20100208152535.GF4113@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> writes:
> > The documentation has definitely improved from the last time Robert
> > looked at it, but I fear it still needs some more work. I'm willing to
> > do that work, but I need something concrete.
>
> It seems to me documentation is required to get into the source tree
> before beta, and as we see with some other patches it's definitely the
> case even with our newer procedures that some code gets in without its
> documentation properly finished. I guess this amounts to the commiter
> willing to fill up the docs later on.
Eh? Previously we allowed code to go in with documentation to be
written after feature freeze. Is this no longer acceptable?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-02-08 15:31:57 | Re: damage control mode |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-08 15:15:47 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Create a "relation mapping" infrastructure to support changing |