|From:||Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>|
|To:||"Massa, Harald Armin" <chef(at)ghum(dot)de>|
|Subject:||Re: Confusion over Python drivers|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
Massa, Harald Armin wrote:
> > The first one listed, Psycopg, is noted as "preferred libpq-based
> > driver", but the license is GPL. Isn't that a problem for many client
> > applications?
> > The licence of psycopg2 is a little more complicated; the "GPL" in that
> summary just tries to sum it. The actual licence is: [from the LICENCE in
> the source distribution]
Wow, that is super-confusing. I am dealing with an issue now that some
companies are concerned that individual names appear with our own BSD
copyrights in small files. That pales in comparison to this copyright.
I would never be able to recommend software with that complex a
I think the community needs to look at other alternatives.
(I am amazed that not only are there a confusing number of drivers, but
there are a confusing number of copyright options for this single driver.)
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
|Next Message||Peter Eisentraut||2010-02-05 14:43:18||Re: Confusion over Python drivers|
|Previous Message||Massa, Harald Armin||2010-02-05 14:28:10||Re: Confusion over Python drivers|