| From: | Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460) |
| Date: | 2010-02-05 04:53:32 |
| Message-ID: | 20100205135332.9C06.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
> > default: both contents and metadata
> > --data-only: same
> > --schema-only: neither
>
> However, it means only large object performs an exceptional object class
> that dumps its owner, acl and comment even if --data-only is given.
> Is it really what you suggested, isn't it?
I wonder we still need to have both "BLOB ITEM" and "BLOB DATA"
even if we will take the all-or-nothing behavior. Can we handle
BLOB's owner, acl, comment and data with one entry kind?
Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2010-02-05 04:59:36 | Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-02-05 04:36:25 | Re: Personal Copyright Notices |