Re: An example of bugs for Hot Standby

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Hiroyuki Yamada <yamada(at)kokolink(dot)net>
Subject: Re: An example of bugs for Hot Standby
Date: 2010-01-20 09:35:10
Message-ID: 201001201035.11395.andres@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wednesday 20 January 2010 06:30:28 Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > Is there any supported platform with sizeof(sig_atomic_t) <4 - I would
> > doubt so?
>
> Er ... what? I believe there are live platforms with sig_atomic_t = char.
> If we're assuming more that's a must-fix.
So were assuming genereally that a integer cannot be read/written
atomatically?
Or was that only relating to the actualy signal.h typedef?

Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2010-01-20 09:40:10 Re: An example of bugs for Hot Standby
Previous Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2010-01-20 09:29:59 Re: lock_timeout GUC patch