Re: Massive table (500M rows) update nightmare

From: Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Massive table (500M rows) update nightmare
Date: 2010-01-08 17:21:47
Message-ID: 20100108172147.GA32049@tux
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Carlo Stonebanks <stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca> wrote:

> Inerestingly, the total index size is 148GB, twice that of the table,
> which may be an indication of where the performance bottleneck is.

Maybe a sign for massive index-bloat?

Andreas
--
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds)
"If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly." (unknown)
Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Carlo Stonebanks 2010-01-08 17:38:46 Re: Massive table (500M rows) update nightmare
Previous Message Carlo Stonebanks 2010-01-08 17:06:14 Re: Massive table (500M rows) update nightmare