Re: pgFoundry Download URLs

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, jd <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgFoundry Download URLs
Date: 2009-12-29 14:10:02
Message-ID: 20091229141002.GC4569@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Devrim GÜNDÜZ escribió:
> On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 11:59 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> > > I might be wrong but I don't think we have that many users that are
> > regulary rebuilding rpms from source with the original tar.gz being on
> > pgfoundry...
> >
> > Well, the big users would be Devrim (RPMs) and I guess whomever does
> > debian packages of the things.
>
> Right. Because of the nature of build system, my build scripts download
> up to 50 copies of each tarball :)

I don't understand how this is a problem. For each new release Devrim
needs to update the URL in the SPEC file anyway, due to the way the URLs
are namespaced with the silly numeric ID, no? Which is exactly what
David is complaining about. How would this be different?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2009-12-29 14:39:57 Re: pgFoundry Download URLs
Previous Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2009-12-29 12:43:37 Re: pgFoundry Download URLs