Re: Why grantor is owner in this case?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: donniehan <donniehan(at)126(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why grantor is owner in this case?
Date: 2009-12-28 11:10:17
Message-ID: 20091228111017.GA4697@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

donniehan wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> I'm sorry to bother you. i really care about this behavior, but i couldn't find the discussions you mentioned in pgsql-hackers archives.
> Would you please tell me more about the discussions(about date? the related issue?), so that i can search it and find it more easily?

Maybe he's referring to this discussion:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1176775180.4152.97.camel%40dogma.v10.wvs

Note that on archives.pg.org it is truncated and continues here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20070503225044.GK4218@alvh.no-ip.org

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ivano Luberti 2009-12-28 11:42:35 Re: Java Postgres drivers.
Previous Message John R Pierce 2009-12-28 08:37:05 Re: Java Postgres drivers.